I was thinking about the difference between for-profit and "for-purpose" organizations; the difference between a manufacturer and a hospital, for example. Classically, TOC tells us that for-profit organizations all have the same goal: make more money now and in the future while satisfying necessary conditions. The goal of schools, hospitals, governments etc. are never nailed down and seem a lot harder to define. Why is this?
I think all organizations have exactly the same goal.
In order to introduce this goal, let me start by talking about money or, rather, money multiplied by time. We are familiar with the concepts of 'lost throughput dollar days' and 'inventory dollar days'. We know how important it is to know not only how long something has been happening but also how much money that thing is worth to an organization. In another thread I'll put down some thoughts about what exactly a 'dollar day' is but, for now, it represents a certain amount of choice. The more money I have and the sooner I have it, the more choice I have about what to do.
The for-profit goal, above, is all about money and time. I therefore believe it is all about choice.
On the other hand a for-purpose organization generally has more trouble articulating its goal. Sure, they have many aims. A hospital, for example, is about caring for patients (but not to the point of keeping them longer than necessary); a charity wants to do good in the world (but not to the point of being starved of cash); a school wants to prepare pupils for the world (without spending too much time on each pupil).
If we look at the most successful for-purpose organizations in each of their sectors, I'm convinced we shall discover an important property. I believe those leading organizations will each have the most choice about the way they operate and the work they do. I believe that the aims of each for-purpose organization can be translated into questions of choice. A hospital wants more choice now and in the future about which patients it treats and what it does for them; a charity wants more choice now and in the future about which people it helps and how it helps; a school wants more choice now and in the future about which pupils it takes on and what it provides for them; all the time, fulfilling legal and moral requirements.
So, maybe the goal of every organization is to have ever more choice while satisfying necessary conditions?
We must define 'choice' but I suspect it will involve the number of possible states an organization can be in while fulfilling its remit.





